SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13294

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SAFIYA.K.K – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 6753 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.PRAJISHA M., SRI.P.RAFTHAS
For the Respondents: SMT. VIDYA KURIAKOSE

Court affirmed the timeline for consideration of applications under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, ensuring timely administrative action.

Headnote:The Writ Petition seeks a mandamus to expedite proceedings under Section 27A of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008. The Court orders the 2nd respondent to report on the Ext.P2 application within one month, and the 1st respondent to consider the application expeditiously within three months of receiving the report. The directions are aimed at ensuring timely compliance with statutory requirements.

Table of Content
1. writ petition seeks expedited consideration of a statutory application. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court directions for timely reporting and action by authorities. (Para 3 , 4)

JUDGMENT

The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:

"i) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the 1st respondent to expedite the proceedings in Exhibit P2, in a time bound manner as fixed by this Hon’ble Court.

(ii) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the 3rd respondent to consider Exhibit P2 and to submit the report to the 1st respondent (iii) To grant such other reliefs as this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case;

(iv) To dispense the production of English translation of malayalamExhibits which is in vernacular language "

[SIC]

2. The main prayer in this Writ Petition is to consider Ext.P2 Form - 6 application filed by the petitioner under Section 27A read with Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008 ('Act and Rules' in short).

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.

4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P2 within a time frame.

Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:

1. The 2nd respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext.P2 application to the 1st respondent/Authorised O period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

2. The 1st respondent/Authorised O to consider the Ext.P2 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from the 2nd respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the report. I make it clear that the 1st respondent is free to pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law.

3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before the 1st and 2nd respondents for compliance.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top