JUDGMENT

The above writ petition is filed with the following prayers:

“i. To issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the 1^st respondent calling for the records leading to Ext.P7 demolition notice and quash the same.

ii. To dispense with the production of translated vernacular documents .

Iii. To stay all further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P7 notice.

iv. To issue such other order or direction, as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper to grant, in the nature and course of the proceeding.”

2. The petitioner is challenging Ext.P7 demolition notice.

Admittedly, Ext.P7 notice was issued based on a complaint filed by one Mr.Prasad Pokkathil. He has not been impleaded as a respondent in this writ petition. Therefore, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition.

3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I think the petitioner can be allowed to submit his objection to Ext.P7 within a time frame, and there can be a direction to consider the same by the Panchayat, with notice to the petitioner and Prasad Pokkathil mentioned above, within a time frame. Till then, the demolition proceedings can be stayed.

4. Therefore, this writ p