IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
HUBAIB AHAMMED – Appellant
Versus
CHERIYAMUNDAM GRAMAPANCHAYATH – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with the following prayers:
“(i) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other order or direction to 1st respondent to consider Ext.P5 application and take appropriate action in accordance with law, within a time frame that may fixed by this Hon’ble court.
(ii) Grant such other reliefs as this court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case including cost of this writ petition(civil), so as to secure the ends of justice.
(iii) Please to dispense English translation of malayalam exhibits.”
2. When this writ petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that it would be sufficient if a direction is issued to the Panchayat to consider Ext.P5 within a time frame. The petitioners have challenged the issuance of licence to the 2nd respondent to operate a Convention Centre.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners.
4. The manner in which this writ petition is going to be disposed of, no notice is necessary for the respondents. If the respondents are aggrieved by any of the directions issued by this Court, they are free to file a review petition before this Court. 5. As mentioned earlier, the only pray
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.