IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
GEETHA K.V – Appellant
Versus
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed with following prayers:
i. call for records leading to Ext.P5 and P8 and issue a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing Ext.P5 and P8 in so far as it directs payment of amount as regularization charges under Sec. 27A of Kerala Conservation of Paddy and Wetland Act .
ii. issue a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the 1st respondent to pass orders on Ext.P4 and P7 without insisting on payment of any amount as is made in Ext.P5 and P8, within such time as may be fixed by this Hon’ble Court.
iii. issue a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents 2, 3 and 4 to correct the entry in the revenue records, changing petitioner’s land covered by Ext.P3 and P6 from nilam to garden land, within such time as may be fixed by this Hon’ble Court.
iv. issue such other orders, writs or directions as are deemed fit by this Hon’ble Court.
v. award cost of this proceedings to the petitioner.
vi. dispense with filing of the translation of vernacular documents produced as Exhibits in the writ petition.
(SIC)
2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration on
06.02.2026, this Court recorded the following submission of the Government Pleader:
“The G
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.