Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13310

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
ANURAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 26518 OF 2017

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.S.RAJEEV, SRI.K.K.DHEERENDRAKRISHNAN, SRI.D.FEROZE, SRI.V.VINAY
For the Respondents: GP – SRI. K. JANARDHANA SHENOY

A petitioner may withdraw a writ petition, leading to its dismissal.

Headnote:The judgment discusses the withdrawal of a writ petition under WP

(C) No. 26518 of 2017. The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition, which was granted by the court. Accordingly, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. The legal principle reinforces a party’s right to withdraw a petition.

JUDGMENT

When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Writ Petition.

Permission is granted.

Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13310

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMP.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, JANURAM – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentWP(C) NO. 26518 OF 2017

A petitioner may withdraw a writ petition, leading to its dismissal.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
ANURAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 26518 OF 2017