Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13311

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SMT.REHIMA BEEGUM – Appellant
Versus
THE SECRETARY, KADUNGALLUR GRAMA PANCHAYATH – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 32664 OF 2019

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.R.O.MUHAMED SHEMEEM, SMT.NASEEHA BEEGUM P.S.
For the Respondents: GP SRI K JANARDHANA SHENOY

A writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous when the underlying issue no longer exists.

Headnote:This judgment evaluates WP

(C) No. 32664 of 2019, where the petitioner, citing the case's infructuous nature, seeks dismissal, with the court accordingly terminating the writ petition. Key findings involve assessing procedural aspects of the petition concerning the applicable legal framework. The court concludes that the presented case does not warrant further examination due to the lack of necessity.

JUDGMENT

When this writ petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this writ petition has become infructuous.

Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13311

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMP.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, JSMT.REHIMA BEEGUM – AppellantVersusTHE SECRETARY, KADUNGALLUR GRAMA PANCHAYATH – RespondentWP(C) NO. 32664 OF 2019

A writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous when the underlying issue no longer exists.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SMT.REHIMA BEEGUM – Appellant
Versus
THE SECRETARY, KADUNGALLUR GRAMA PANCHAYATH – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 32664 OF 2019