SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13312

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
MUBSHEER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 33948 OF 2017



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.PAUL K.VARGHESE
For the Respondents: GP – SRI. K JANARDHANA SHENOY

The court mandates timely administrative action on pending applications in administrative law context.

Headnote:The Writ Petition seeks a mandamus commanding the Revenue Divisional Officer to dispose of an application submitted by the petitioners. The Court directs the second respondent to take appropriate action on the application within three months, considering it if it's received and in order. The court emphasizes efficiency in handling pending applications.

Result: The second respondent must act on the application expeditiously.

Table of Content
1. nature of relief sought through the writ petition. (Para 1)
2. counsel's submission on the satisfaction of petitioners. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:

" i) Issue a writ of mandamus, or other appropriate writ or order or direction commanding the 3rd respondent to consider and dispose of Exhibit P3 application at earliest by allowing it.

ii) lssue such other writ, order, direction may be necessary to the facts and circumstances of the case."

[SIC]

2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.P3 by the 2nd respondent.

3. Heard the learned Government Pleader also.

In the light of the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:

The 2nd respondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders in Ext.P3 (if it is received and is pending as on today, and if it is in order), as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top