IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
MUBSHEER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
" i) Issue a writ of mandamus, or other appropriate writ or order or direction commanding the 3rd respondent to consider and dispose of Exhibit P3 application at earliest by allowing it.
ii) lssue such other writ, order, direction may be necessary to the facts and circumstances of the case."
[SIC]
2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.P3 by the 2nd respondent.
3. Heard the learned Government Pleader also.
In the light of the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:
The 2nd respondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders in Ext.P3 (if it is received and is pending as on today, and if it is in order), as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.
Sd/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.