SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13312

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
MUBSHEER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.PAUL K.VARGHESE
For the Respondents: GP – SRI. K JANARDHANA SHENOY

JUDGMENT

The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:

" i) Issue a writ of mandamus, or other appropriate writ or order or direction commanding the 3rd respondent to consider and dispose of Exhibit P3 application at earliest by allowing it.

ii) lssue such other writ, order, direction may be necessary to the facts and circumstances of the case."

[SIC]

2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.P3 by the 2nd respondent.

3. Heard the learned Government Pleader also.

In the light of the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:

The 2nd respondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders in Ext.P3 (if it is received and is pending as on today, and if it is in order), as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top