IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SASEENDRAN, SAJIMOL, VISWAN – Appellant
Versus
PURAKKAD GRAMA PANCHAYATH – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"i) to issue a writ of mandamus or other writ or order directing respondents 1 to 3, to take appropriate action against the illegal construction and functioning of the peeling shed therein.
ii) to issue a writ of mandamus or other writ or order directing respondents 1 to 3 to take appropriate action against the illegal construction and functioning of the peeling shed therein, accumulation of waste and causing foul of its bad smell in the locality.
iii) to issue such other further reliefs as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case.
iv) To dispense with the English translation of vernacular documents.
v) Allow the writ petition with cost."
[SIC]
2. The petitioners are aggrieved because respondents 1 to 3 are not taking further action based on the stop memo issued against respondents 4 and 5 for the alleged illegal construction and the illegal conduct of peeling shed by them without obtaining any permit/license. It is submitted that respondents 4 and 5 are the neighbouring property owner of the petitioners. Respondents 4 and 5 constructed a building in their property a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.