SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13319

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Sathish Ninan, P. Krishna Kumar, JJ
SUNNY.P.J – Appellant
Versus
RANI MATHEW – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.SHYAM PADMAN (SR.), SHRI.C.M.ANDREWS, SMT.ANITYA ANNIE MATHEW, SMT.BOBY M.SEKHAR, SHRI.P.T.MOHANKUMAR, SMT.NEETHU RAVIKUMAR, SMT.REVATHY P. MANOHARAN
For the Respondents: SRI.GEORGE MATHEW, SRI.M.D.SASIKUMARAN, SHRI.PRAVEEN S., SHRI.SUNIL KUMAR A.G, SRI.DIPU JAMES, SRI.MATHEW K.T., SRI.GEORGE K.V.

Hence, this appeal is dismissed for non-

prosecution.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top