IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ
NISAMUDEEN. J – Appellant
Versus
ABDULLA SHAFI – Respondent
O R D E R
P.V.BALAKRISHNAN,J This is an application filed seeking leave to file a review petition against the judgment dated 11.08.2025 passed in W.P.(C)
No.29607 of 2025.
2. Heard Adv. T.R.Rajan, the learned counsel appearing for the applicants.
3. The learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the applicants are members of the 7th respondent Jamaath and they are aggrieved by the directions in the judgment to keep the election in abeyance, till the disposal of Exts.P1 and P3 petitions, since it has caused serious prejudice to the members of the 7th respondent-Jamaath including the applicants, who are deprived of their right to constitute democratically elected managing committee in accordance with the bye-laws. He further submitted that the election is not notified to 16.08.2025 as stated in the judgment and the same is an error apparent on the face of the record.
4. On an anxious consideration of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicants, we find no merit in it. A perusal of the judgment passed in W.P.(C) No.29607 of 2025 would show that election has been deferred till a decision is taken on Exts.P1 and P3, by the Wakf Board and nothing more. If applicants
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.