A review petition cannot be granted on grounds of alleged error if the error does not substantively affect the case outcome.

O R D E R

P.V.BALAKRISHNAN,J This is an application filed seeking leave to file a review petition against the judgment dated 11.08.2025 passed in W.P.(C)

No.29607 of 2025.

2. Heard Adv. T.R.Rajan, the learned counsel appearing for the applicants.

3. The learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the applicants are members of the 7^th respondent Jamaath and they are aggrieved by the directions in the judgment to keep the election in abeyance, till the disposal of Exts.P1 and P3 petitions, since it has caused serious prejudice to the members of the 7^th respondent-Jamaath including the applicants, who are deprived of their right to constitute democratically elected managing committee in accordance with the bye-laws. He further submitted that the election is not notified to 16.08.2025 as stated in the judgment and the same is an error apparent on the face of the record.

4. On an anxious consideration of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicants, we find no merit in it. A perusal of the judgment passed in W.P.(C) No.29607 of 2025 would show that election has been deferred till a decision is taken on Exts.P1 and P3, by the Wakf Board and nothing more. If applicants are aggrieved by the non disposal of Exts.P1 and P3, their remedy lies elsewhere and not in this review petition. Similarly, even if the date of the election stated in the judgment is incorrect, the same is inconsequential, since the date is already over. In such circumstances, we find no grounds to grant leave to the applicants, as sought for.

Resultantly, I.A.No...of 2025 (Filing No. 1 of 2025) will stand dismissed.

Sd/-