SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13324

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI, J
YOUSAF – Appellant
Versus
SATHYABHAMA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR)
For the Respondents: SRI.SREEDHAR RAVINDRAN

JUDGMENT

The original petition has been filed seeking to set aside Ext.P9 order, whereby an application to remit a commission application was rejected. The suit has been under stay for the past ten years. No purpose will be served by retaining this original petition any longer before this Court. Since it is only a case of remitting the commission report, the original petition is allowed. Ext.P9 is set aside. IA No.175 of 2014 in OS.No.217 of 2009 on the file of Sub Court, Ottappalam is allowed. There will be a direction to the Court below to appoint an Advocate Commissioner or remit the commission report to the same commissioner, if the same commissioner is available, and after getting a fresh report, the trial shall be proceeded with. Since it is an old matter, all efforts shall be taken to complete the trial and dispose of the suit within six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. It is made clear that the commission report which is already available is not set aside.

Sd/-

T.R.RAVI JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top