SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13325

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
JOSE MORRIS – Appellant
Versus
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CORPORATION OFFICE – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR
For the Respondents: SRI.N.NANDAKUMARA MENON (SR.), SHRI.P.K.MANOJKUMAR, SC, TVPM CORPORATION, SHRI.SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY, SC, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CORPORATION

JUDGMENT

The learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that there are no instructions from the petitioner regarding the matter and hence the matter may be closed.

Accordingly, this writ petition is closed.

Sd/-

VIJU ABRAHAM JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top