Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13325

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
JOSE MORRIS – Appellant
Versus
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CORPORATION OFFICE – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 6884 OF 2020

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR
For the Respondents: SRI.N.NANDAKUMARA MENON (SR.), SHRI.P.K.MANOJKUMAR, SC, TVPM CORPORATION, SHRI.SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY, SC, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CORPORATION

The absence of instructions from petitioners led to the closure of the writ petition.

Headnote:This judgment pertains to a writ petition which was proposed for admission. The learned counsel for the petitioners indicated a lack of instructions and requested closure of the matter. The court, accordingly, decided to close the writ petition.

Result: 'This writ petition is closed.'

JUDGMENT

The learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that there are no instructions from the petitioner regarding the matter and hence the matter may be closed.

Accordingly, this writ petition is closed.

Sd/-

VIJU ABRAHAM JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13325

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMVIJU ABRAHAM, JJOSE MORRIS – AppellantVersusREPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CORPORATION OFFICE – RespondentWP(C) NO. 6884 OF 2020

The absence of instructions from petitioners led to the closure of the writ petition.

Headnote:This judgment pertains to a writ petition which was proposed for admission. The learned counsel for the petitioners indicated a lack of instructions and requested closure of the matter. The court, accordingly, decided to close the writ petition. Result: 'This writ petition is closed.'

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
JOSE MORRIS – Appellant
Versus
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CORPORATION OFFICE – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 6884 OF 2020

Headnote:This judgment pertains to a writ petition which was proposed for admission. The learned counsel for the petitioners indicated a lack of instructions and requested closure of the matter. The court, accordingly, decided to close the writ petition.

Result: 'This writ petition is closed.'