SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13341

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Basant Balaji, J
SREEMESH P.P @ SREEMESH MURALI – Appellant
Versus
MUTHOOT HOUSING FINANCE COMPANY LTD. – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 6710 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.B.MUHAMMED SHAHEEL, SHRI.JYOTHI R. NAIR, SHRI.JASAD V.
For the Respondents: SRI. M. PREMCHAND, SC

Court deferred possession under SARFAESI Act allowing the petitioner to approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal.

Headnote:This judgment concerns the challenge against an order under the SARFAESI Act, the petitioner seeking relief from the High Court. The court finds the petition not maintainable against a private financial institution and defers possession for two weeks for the petitioner to seek remedy. "The writ petition is disposed of as above."

Table of Content
1. challenge against order under sarfaesi act. (Para 1)
2. court's reliance on precedent regarding maintainability. (Para 2)
3. court's decision to defer action for statutory remedy. (Para 3)

BASANT BALAJI J ======================

W.P.(C) No. 6710 of 2026 ========================

Dated 20th day of February, 2026 JUDGMENT The petitioner has approached this Court challenging Ext.P1 order dated 01.11.2025 in CMP No.2890 of 2025 passed under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act , 2002 (for short, the SARFAESI Act). Ext.P2 is the notice of inspection issued by the Advocate Commissioner for taking physical possession of the secured asset today (20.02.2026).

2. The learned counsel for the respondents also pointed out that the respondent is a private financial institution and, therefore, reliance is placed on the decision of the Supreme Court in Shoba S v. Muthoot Finance Ltd. , 2025 (2) KHC 229 , and submitted that the writ petition is not maintainable against the said respondent.

3. In the above circumstances, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition and the petitioner is relegated to avail the statutory remedy under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act before the Debts Recovery Tribunal. However, considering that physical possession of the secured asset is proposed to be taken today, I deem it appropriate to defer the taking of physical possession for a period of two weeks from today to enable the petitioner to approach the DRT. Till then, further proceedings for taking physical possession shall be kept in abeyance.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top