Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. JAYACHANDRAN, J
VIJAY ANAND KRISHNAN – Appellant
Versus
THE TAHSILDAR PARAVUR – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 5711 OF 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. need for timely consideration of registry applications. (Para 1) |
| 2. emphasis on hearing affected parties before decisions. (Para 2) |
JUDGMENT
Ext.P3 is an application preferred by the petitioner seeking transfer of registry. The same has not been considered by the 1st respondent, is the short grievance.
2. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader, this Court directs the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P3 application in accordance with law, expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment before the 1st respondent, for compliance. Needless to say that the petitioner, as also, any other affected party shall be afforded opportunity of being heard, before taking a call in Ext.P3. Petitioner will submit a copy of Ext.P3 before the 1st respondent, since Ext.P3 is now pending consideration before the 2nd respondent.
This Writ Petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
