SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13349

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. JAYACHANDRAN, J
VIJAY ANAND KRISHNAN – Appellant
Versus
THE TAHSILDAR PARAVUR – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: P.K.SREEVALSAKRISHNAN, K.R.PRATHISH
For the Respondents: SMT.DEEPA NARAYANAN, SR. GP

JUDGMENT

Ext.P3 is an application preferred by the petitioner seeking transfer of registry. The same has not been considered by the 1st respondent, is the short grievance.

2. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader, this Court directs the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P3 application in accordance with law, expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment before the 1st respondent, for compliance. Needless to say that the petitioner, as also, any other affected party shall be afforded opportunity of being heard, before taking a call in Ext.P3. Petitioner will submit a copy of Ext.P3 before the 1st respondent, since Ext.P3 is now pending consideration before the 2nd respondent.

This Writ Petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top