Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13351

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
ABDUL JALEEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 9242 OF 2022

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri.C.S.Manilal, Sri.S.Nidheesh
For the Respondents: Smt. C.Seena, Public Prosecutor, Sri.R.Bindu (Sasthamangalam), Sri.R.Jayakrishnan, Sri.G.Rajagopal (Kummanam)

The court has the authority to dismiss a case as infructuous if the matter no longer requires adjudication.

Headnote:The court analyzed the petitioner's request for dismissing the Criminal Miscellaneous Case due to it becoming infructuous. After reviewing the submission made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the court concluded the case was no longer relevant in light of the circumstances presented. As a result, the court decided to dismiss the application as infructuous.

ORDER

Dated this the 20^th day of February, 2026 The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that this Criminal Miscellaneous has become infructuous and it could be dismissed as infructuous.

In the light of the above submission, this Criminal Miscellaneous Case is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13351

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMC.PRATHEEP KUMAR, JABDUL JALEEL – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentCRL.MC NO. 9242 OF 2022

The court has the authority to dismiss a case as infructuous if the matter no longer requires adjudication.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
ABDUL JALEEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 9242 OF 2022