Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.V.A.MUHAMMED, SMT.P.A.JENZIA
For the Respondents: SRI.V.VENUGOPAL

Compliance with court directions is essential to avoid contempt.

Headnote:In Contempt Case

(C) No. 2882 of 2025, the petitioner, Afeefa T., represented by counsel, submitted compliance with directions in W.P.

(C) No. 6296 of 2025. The Court confirmed compliance and closed the contempt case. The primary issue was the adherence to prior judicial instructions. The court concluded that compliance was satisfactory, leading to the closure of the case.

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 20^th day of February, 2026 Counsel on either side submit that the directions contained in the judgment dated 17.02.2025 in W.P.(C)

No.6296 of 2025 stand complied with.

Recording the said submission, the Contempt of Court Case is closed.

Sd/-

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :