SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13425

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
THE DIRECTOR LOURDES HOSPITAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA AND ANOTHER – Respondent
RP NO. 80 OF 2011



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.PAUL JACOB, SMT.SHERU JOSEPH, SRI.MATHEW THOMAS, SMT.NIKITTA TRESSY GEORGE
For the Respondents: SMT.G.SHEEBA

The court reaffirmed the need to review applications on their merits unconditionally as per the directive from the Supreme Court regarding procedural fairness.

Headnote:The Review Petition reviews the Order dated 15.06.2009, allowing an application under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, related to wage claims of workers. The Supreme Court's directive for expeditious disposal of the case was addressed. The court determined that I.A. No.13415/2007 would be reviewed on its merits without bias from the previous order. The Review Petition was ultimately dismissed.

Table of Content
1. review petition and wages under industrial disputes act (Para 1)
2. supreme court's directive for merit-based review (Para 2 , 3)
3. final dismissal of review petition (Para 4)

O R D E R

1. This Review Petition is filed by the Petitioner in W.P.(C)

No.28369/2006 - Management in the I.D., to review the Order dated 15.06.2009 in I.A. No.13415/2007 in the Writ Petition allowing the said Application filed under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. I.A. No.13415/2007 is filed by the Respondent No.2/Union in the Writ Petition claiming the last drawn wages of six workers out of 24 workers involved in I.D. No.3/2004.

2. The Hon'ble Supreme Court passed Annexure A3 Order dated 30.07.2010 dismissing S.L.P.(C) No. 19826/2010 filed by the Management arising from an Order in this Writ Petition. Hon’ble Supreme Court dismissed the SLP, taking note of the request of the Division Bench of this Court to the learned Single Judge to dispose of the Writ Petition expeditiously. The Hon’ble Supreme Court also made an order requesting the learned Single Judge to dispose of the Writ Petition as expeditiously as practicable. It is further observed that if it is unable to take up the Writ Petition for early hearing, the learned Single Judge may consider the stand of the Petitioner therein/Management that the Respondents are not entitled to any payment under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947, since, according to the Petitioner therein, they are gainfully employed, and making it clear that the said plea of the Petitioner therein shall be considered on its own merits uninfluenced by the earlier order of the learned Single Judge.

3. In view of the aforesaid Order, I.A. No.13415/2007 is to be considered by this Court on merits again, uninfluenced by the Order dated 15.06.2009.

4. Hence, there is no need to consider the prayer to review the Order dated 15.06.2009 impugned in this Review Petition. Accordingly, this Review Petition is dismissed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top