The court denied pre-arrest bail citing the serious nature of allegations and the ongoing investigation.

ORDER

This application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking pre-

arrest bail.

2. The applicant is the accused No.1 in Crime No.6/2026 of Vattappara Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 296 (b), 126(2), 115(2), 118(1) and 118(2) read with Section

3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 .

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that due to prior enmity, on 04.01.2026 at about 12.30 a.m. at Kuravankonam, accused Nos.1 to 4, acting in furtherance of their common intention, assaulted the defacto complainant. The applicant struck him on the face with an iron rod, causing him to fall down. The accused No.2 sat on him and assaulted him, while the applicant and accused No.2 restrained and assaulted him by punching and kicking. The applicant again struck him with the iron rod, causing a fracture of the nasal bone and thereby committed the above offences.

4. I have heard Sri.Nikhil Sankar S., the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri.M.C.Ashi, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to bail. The learned Senior Public Prosecutor, on the other hand, submitted that the alleged incident occurred as part of the applicant's intentional criminal acts, and if he is released on bail at this stage, it will affect the course of the investigation.

6. The law regarding the grant or refusal of pre-arrest bail is well settled. Pre-arrest bail cannot be granted as a matter of course. The power under Section 482 of BNSS could be exercised only when a special case is made out, that too, recording reasons thereof. Perusal of the case diary reveals that the accusation made against the applicant is very serious in nature, and it prima facie shows a premeditated criminal act on his part. I went through the FIS. Specific overt act has been alleged against the applicant. The applicant has used weapon. The defacto complainant sustained nasal bone fracture in the incident. The investigation is in a preliminary stage. Considering the gravity of the offence and stage of the investigation, I am of the view that this is not a fit case where the extraordinary jurisdiction vested with this Court under of could be invoked.

7. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is prepared to surrender before the investigating officer. If the applicant surrenders before the investigating officer within one week from today, the investigating officer shall interrogate him and after interrogation if the investigating officer forms an opinion that the applicant is to be arrested, the investigating officer shall record the arrest of the applicant and produce him before the jurisdictional Magistrate. The bail application if any moved by the applicant shall be disposed of by the learned Magistrate, in accordance with law, as far as possible, on the same day itself. A copy of the bail application shall be given to the learned Public Prosecutor in advance. The bail application is, accordingly, dismissed with the above observations.

Sd/-