SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13439

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
NIDHIN. K. S – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 1050 OF 2026 | CRIME NO.570/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.RENJITH B.MARAR, SMT.LAKSHMI.N.KAIMAL, SRI.P.RAJKUMAR, SRI.KESHAVRAJ NAIR, SHRI.BIJU VIGNESWAR, SHRI.ARUN POOMULLI, SHRI.ABHIRAM.S, SMT.GAADHA SURESH, SHRI.VISWANATH JAYAN, SHRI.AKSHAY SHIBU, SHRI.FAYAS MUHAMMED S, SHRI.ANANTHAPADMANABHAN, SHRI.ASHISH PAUL, SMT.LAXMISREE JAYANTHA KUMAR, SHRI.MURALI KRISHNA PRASAD
For the Respondents: SMT.SREEJA V., SR. PP

The court upheld the right to withdraw bail applications, reflecting the applicant's autonomy in such matters.

Headnote:The court addresses the bail application under BAIL APPL. NO. 1050 OF 2026 pertaining to CRIME NO.570/2025. The learned counsel for the appellant requests permission to withdraw the application. The court finds the request valid and, therefore, dismisses the bail application as withdrawn.

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw this Bail Application. Permission is granted.

Accordingly, this Bail Application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

App_Store_Badge Google_Play_Store

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon Instagram Icon Twitter Icon

Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

whatsapp-icon