SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13451

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
JAYARAJAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 1700 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.M.R.SASITH, SMT.R.K.CHIRUTHA, SMT.ANJANA SURESH.E, SMT.REETHU JACOB, SMT.HASNA JABIL, SMT.ANJITHA S., SMT.PRAGATHY PREM NAIR, SMT.MEERA NAIR.I.P, SMT.ANN GINI ROY
For the Respondents: SRI SANAL P RAJ

The court permits a petitioner to surrender and file for bail, mandating expedited consideration of such applications in light of health constraints.

Headnote:This case concerns the petitioner's request for relief from a non-bailable warrant issued for his failure to appear in court due to health issues, specifically Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. The court allows the petitioner to surrender and file for bail within four weeks, requiring the trial court to consider it promptly. It is determined that the petitioner may surrender in light of his health and previous mediation attempts, ensuring due process is followed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks to surrender due to health issues. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court allows surrender and mandates expedited bail application process. (Para 3)

ORDER

The petitioner is the accused in S.T.No.2418/2025 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate - I, Aluva, (Trial Court), which has been registered on the basis of a complaint filed against petitioner for allegedly committing the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act ,1881, (‘NI Act’, in short)

2. The petitioner has stated in the criminal miscellaneous case that he had appeared before the Trial Court for mediation. However, as the mediation had failed the petitioner was directed to appear before the Trial Court and get himself enlarged on bail. But, due to the petitioner’s health condition and that he has been advised to undergo a surgery, as discernible from Annexure A4 certificate, the petitioner was unable to appear before the Trial Court. Unmindful of the above aspects, a non-bailable warrant has been issued against him. The petitioner is willing to surrender before the Trial Court and file applications to recall the non- bailable warrant and to get himself enlarged on bail. Nonetheless, the petitioner is apprehensive that, if he surrenders before the Trial Court, his applications may be dismissed and he may be remanded to judicial custody, especially since he can only surrender within a month from today (26.02.2026) due to his health conditions. Hence, the Crl.M.C.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

On a consideration of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing anything on the merits of the matter, I dispose of the Crl.M.C, by permitting the petitioner to surrender before the Trial Court within four weeks from today (26.02.2026), and file applications to recall the non-bailable warrant and to enlarge him on bail, after serving advance copies on the learned Public Prosecutor. If such applications are filed, within the four weeks from today, the Trial Court is directed to consider and the dispose the applications, in accordance with law, on the very same day the petitioner surrenders before the said Court.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top