SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13452

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S. DIAS, J
AL RASHAD A – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M.R. Sarin
For the Respondents: M.P. Prasanth

O R D E R Dated this the 26th day of February, 2026 The petitioner is the 6th accused in S.C.No.2341/2025 on the file of the Court of the Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Thiruvananthapuram, which has originated from Crime No.915/2024 registered by the Vellarada Police Station alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 20 (b)(ii) C, 8(c) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 .

2. The petitioner has stated in the Criminal Miscellaneous Case that, by Annexure A2 order, the petitioner was enlarged on bail subject to conditions. As per condition No.5, the petitioner was directed to appear before the Investigating Officer on every Sunday, until further orders. Since the investigation in the case is complete and the complaint is filed, the petitioner had filed an application before the above court, seeking modification of condition No.5. However, by Annexure A3 order, the said court has dismissed the application, on the ground that the contraband involved in the case is of a commercial quantity and, therefore, there is every likelihood of the petitioner committing a similar offence. Annexure A3 order is unreasonable and unjustifiable.

Hen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top