SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13454

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G. GIRISH, J
MUHAMMED MUSTHAFA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.GEORGE MATHEW, SRI.PRAVEEN S., SRI.SUNIL KUMAR A.G, SRI.MATHEW K.T., SRI.GEORGE K.V.
For the Respondents: SRI.P.SAMSUDIN, SRI.M.ANUROOP, SMT.S.K.SREELAKSHMY

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in spite of repeated letters having been sent to the petitioner, no instructions have been given.

In the light of the above submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Crl.M.C. stands closed for non-prosecution.

(Sd/-)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top