IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
ANIL JOY – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner has approached this Court pointing out that the 1st respondent herein has issued Ext.P2 order essentially on the basis of a complaint filed by the 4th respondent, as per which he has been directed to cut and remove the the trees to the extent that is causing threat to the life of the 4th respondent.
2. Sri. R. Renjith, the learned counsel for the respondent-Panchayat, places reliance on the Ext.P1 communication dated 28.04.2023 issued by the Panchayat on the basis of the compliant filed by the 4th respondent, as per which the direction was only to cut and remove the overhanging branches of the trees in the petitioner’s property to the extent that they overhang into the property of the 4th respondent..
3. While admitting the writ petition on
02.08.2023, this Court has issued the following order:
“Admit. Government Pleader takes notice for respondents 1 and 3. Issue urgent notice by speed post to respondents 2 and 4.
In the meanwhile, there will be an interim order staying the operation of Ext.P2 on condition that the petitioner cuts the branches of the trees on the eastern side of his property hanging over the property of the 4th respondent, within a period
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.