SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13478

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N. NAGARESH, J
SIVADASAN M. – Appellant
Versus
KERALA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 28372 OF 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.LEGITH T.KOTTAKKAL, SRI.P.R.BANERJI, SHRI.SAVIO BINOY CORREYA
For the Respondents: SRI.M.V.ANANDAN, SC, SRI.PREMCHAND R NAIR, SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER

Promotion should yield appropriate financial benefits reflecting the responsibilities and status of the position, and anomalies in pay scales must be rectified.

Headnote:(A) Kerala Agricultural University Act, 1971 - Higher Pay Scale - The petitioner, promoted as Vehicle Supervisor (LDV), contends for higher pay than Driver Selection Grade (LDV) due to inequitable pay scales after pay revisions - Anomaly acknowledged but not rectified - Court observes that the responsibilities warrant a greater pay scale, issuing a directive for revision of pay. (Paras 1, 4, 24, 26)

(B) Promotion and Pay Revision - The principle that promotion should accord with an elevated scale, reflecting the responsibilities of the post held, is reaffirmed by the court. (Paras 18, 24)

Table of Content
1. promotion without corresponding pay scale results in inequity. (Para 1 , 4 , 6)
2. employment policies should adhere to pay equity. (Para 8 , 12 , 18 , 19)
3. anomalies in pay scale require rectification based on responsibilities. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 13 , 15 , 20)
4. higher pay scale should reflect status, leading to directive for revision. (Para 25 , 26)

J U D G M E N T

The grievance of the petitioner is that though he is promoted to a Higher Grade post, it is without any monetary benefits. The petitioner seeks to direct the respondents to fix higher pay scale to the post of Vehicle Supervisor (LDV) higher than that of Selection Grade (LDV) and grant all consequential benefits including arrears of salary from the date of promotion to the petitioner.

2. The petitioner states that he entered service under the 1st respondent-Kerala Agricultural University on 21.06.2010 as Driver (LDV). He was promoted as Vehicle Supervisor (LDV) on 07.08.2020. In the 1st respondent-University, the Grades prescribed for Driver (LDV) are (a) Driver Grade-II (LDV), (b) Driver Grade-I (LDV), (c) Driver Senior Grade (LDV) and (d) Driver Selection Grade (LDV). The next promotion post is Vehicle Supervisor (LDV).

3. When the 9th Pay Revision was effected, the post of Vehicle Supervisor (LDV) was abolished with a condition that the post of Vehicle Supervisor will be retained for those who entered into the service of the 1st respondent before 01.02.2011.

4. While implementing the recommendations of the 9th Pay Revision, certain anomalies arose. The 1st respondent issued Ext.P1 order dated 17.02.2014 to rectify the anomalies. In order to rectify the anomalies, Drivers (LDV) were classified as “Drivers joined service before 01.02.2011” and “Driver joined service after 01.02.2011”. The post of Vehicle Supervisor was retained only to those persons who entered service before 01.02.2011. The petitioner was promoted as Vehicle Supervisor (LDV) in the year 2020.

5. On implementing the 9th Pay Revision, the pay scales of Selection Grade (LDV) and Vehicle Supervisor (LDV) were merged though Vehicle Supervisor is a superior / promotion post. The salary of Driver Selection Grade (LDV) was in the scale ₹7,990-12,930 and the pay scale of Vehicle Supervisor (LDV) was ₹8,390-13,270. On implementation of Pay Revision 2009, the pay scales of both the posts were revised to ₹14,620-25,280. The anomaly was carried on in the 10th Pay Revision also.

6. The petitioner states that in the branch of Heavy Duty Vehicles, the Vehicle Supervisor (HDV) is drawing a higher pay than Driver Selection Grade (HDV). Therefore, the pay scale of Vehicle Supervisor (LDV) should be revised and enhanced. The University noted the anomaly and addressed a letter to the 4th respondent-Agricultural Development and Farmers Welfare Department, Kerala requiring to rectify the anomaly. No action was taken thereon in spite of repeated requests made by the petitioner.

7. The petitioner later came to know that proposal made by the University was rejected by the 4th respondent as per Ext.P12 letter dated 09.08.2023. The petitioner states that non-granting of higher pay for the promoted post of Vehicle Supervisor (LDV) is illegal and arbitrary. Promotion means advancement or preferment in honour, dignity, rank and/or grade. The Government failed to consider the request of the University to rectify the anomaly. Therefore, the 1st respondent is compellable to grant higher pay scale to the petitioner as that of the Vehicle Supervisor (HDV) , contends the petitioner.

8. The 1st respondent filed counter affidavit. The 1st respondent stated that in the 9th and subsequent Pay Revision orders, the Government has been allowing same scale of pay to the posts of Vehicle Supervisor (LDV) and Driver Selection Grade (LDV) of the Kerala Agricultural University and hence the University can allow the pay scale specified in the Pay Revision Order. The University does not have any right to enhance a pay scale on its own.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top