Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.B.N.SHIVSANKAR
For the Respondents: GP- RIYAL DEVASSY

The court emphasized the necessity of clear grounds for allowing the review of a previous judgment.

Headnote:The court reviewed the judgment dated 19.01.2026 in the context of the legal provisions applicable to the review of judgments. The facts involved a petition for review against previous orders related to a writ petition. The court allowed the review, recalling the prior judgment and restoring the writ petition to file. The key issue was whether sufficient grounds were presented warranting the review, leading to the conclusion that the earlier ruling needed to be adjusted. The verdict delivered was to allow the review petition and restore the writ petition.

ORDER

After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, I am inclined to review the judgment dated

19.01.2026.

Accordingly the review petition is allowed. Judgment dated

19.01.2026 is recalled and the writ petition is restored to file.

Sd/-

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :