Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13486

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
SHOUKATHALI.K.P – Appellant
Versus
THE SECRETARY, KANNUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 4293 OF 2021

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.K.DEEPA
For the Respondents: SMT.M.MEENA JOHN, SC, KANNUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, SHRI.M.V.AMARESAN, SRI.S.S.ARAVIND

A petition is rendered infructuous if the underlying issues are no longer relevant or actionable.

Headnote:The Writ Petition (Civil) was filed by the petitioner seeking redressal of grievances against the Municipal Corporation. The court examined submissions from both sides and found the petition infructuous, concluding that there was no basis for further proceedings. The underlying legal principles and claims were extinguished by the current status of affairs in paragraph 1. In reaching this determination, the court highlighted that the matter no longer held relevant legal significance.

JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13486

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMVIJU ABRAHAM, JSHOUKATHALI.K.P – AppellantVersusTHE SECRETARY, KANNUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION – RespondentWP(C) NO. 4293 OF 2021

A petition is rendered infructuous if the underlying issues are no longer relevant or actionable.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
SHOUKATHALI.K.P – Appellant
Versus
THE SECRETARY, KANNUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 4293 OF 2021