Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13489
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
THE MEMBER SECRETARY,NAVY EDUCATION SOCIETY – Appellant
Versus
THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER GRATUITY PAYMENT ACT 1972 – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 18662 OF 2022
Important Points
Withdrawal of a writ petition is permissible under the relevant statutory provisions, as demonstrated in this case.
Subject
Administrative Law - Writ Jurisdiction
Act Referred
Gratuity Payment Act 1972: Relevant provisionS.regarding withdrawal of petitions
Headnote
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking to address grievances relating to the Gratuity Payment Act, 1972. The court noted the withdrawal request and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn on that basis. The concluding judgment highlights the limited scope of withdrawal under the statutory provisions.
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: O.M.SHALINA
For the Respondents: SMT.MINI GOPINATH, SRI.V.RENJITH KUMAR, SRI.K.S.HARIDAS, SHRI.MOHAPRASEED MOHAN
For the Appellants/Petitioners: O.M.SHALINA
For the Respondents: SMT.MINI GOPINATH, SRI.V.RENJITH KUMAR, SRI.K.S.HARIDAS, SHRI.MOHAPRASEED MOHAN
JUDGMENT
A memo has been filed on behalf of the petitioners seeking to withdraw the writ petition.
Memo is recorded and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
