Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13489

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
THE MEMBER SECRETARY,NAVY EDUCATION SOCIETY – Appellant
Versus
THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER GRATUITY PAYMENT ACT 1972 – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 18662 OF 2022

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: O.M.SHALINA
For the Respondents: SMT.MINI GOPINATH, SRI.V.RENJITH KUMAR, SRI.K.S.HARIDAS, SHRI.MOHAPRASEED MOHAN

Withdrawal of a writ petition is permissible under the relevant statutory provisions, as demonstrated in this case.

Headnote:The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking to address grievances relating to the Gratuity Payment Act, 1972. The court noted the withdrawal request and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn on that basis. The concluding judgment highlights the limited scope of withdrawal under the statutory provisions.

JUDGMENT

A memo has been filed on behalf of the petitioners seeking to withdraw the writ petition.

Memo is recorded and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13489

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMVIJU ABRAHAM, JTHE MEMBER SECRETARY,NAVY EDUCATION SOCIETY – AppellantVersusTHE APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER GRATUITY PAYMENT ACT 1972 – RespondentWP(C) NO. 18662 OF 2022

Withdrawal of a writ petition is permissible under the relevant statutory provisions, as demonstrated in this case.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
THE MEMBER SECRETARY,NAVY EDUCATION SOCIETY – Appellant
Versus
THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER GRATUITY PAYMENT ACT 1972 – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 18662 OF 2022