SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13510

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
SAYYID SAFWAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 14699 OF 2025 | CRIME NO.26/2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.NAJAH EBRAHIM V.P., SRI.S.RAJEEV, SHRI.MUSAMIL HUVAIS C.K., SRI.M.S.ANEER, SHRI.ANILKUMAR C.R., SHRI.SARATH K.P.
For the Respondents: SMT.SREEJA V., SR. PP

A bail application must first approach the Sessions Court unless exceptional circumstances exist.

Headnote:The applicant sought pre-arrest bail under Section 35(3) of BNSS without approaching the Sessions Court first. The court found no exceptional circumstances to justify the application. The application was dismissed, allowing the applicant to seek relief from the Sessions Court next.

ORDER

The applicant has approached this Court with an application for pre-arrest bail without first approaching the Sessions Court. No exceptional circumstances have been canvassed.

Hence, this bail application is dismissed without prejudice to the right of the applicant to approach the Sessions Court and seek for pre-arrest bail.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top