Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
NAJEEB HASSAN – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF PALAKKAD – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 2028 OF 2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks protection for quarry amid license issues. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court acknowledges the petitioner's lack of operational license. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, who is the owner of a quarry, has approached this Court seeking police protection against respondent Nos.4 and 5.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader, as well as the learned counsel for R4 and R5.
3. Though this Court, while admitting the writ petition on 20.1.2023, had directed the SHO to look into the complaint submitted by the petitioner and take necessary action in accordance with law, it is pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner that, as of now, they do not have a licence and quarrying operations are not being carried out at present.
Recording the afore submission, this writ petition is closed.
Sd/-
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
