SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13527

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
C.C. WILLIAM VERGHESE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER ELAMAKKARA POLICE STATION – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 11921 OF 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.A.MOHAMMED SHAH, SHRI.RENOY VINCENT, SMT.HELEN P.A., SRI.SHAHIR SHOWKATH ALI
For the Respondents: SRI. SUNIL NATH

The court affirmed police protection for individuals against threats based on assessed risks in existing relationships.

Headnote:The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus for police protection from potential threats due to alleged animosity from the third respondent. The Court admitted the writ petition, acknowledging previous interim protection orders and affirmed their continuation based on the safety considerations presented. The Court concluded with a formalization of the interim order that assures ongoing protection for the petitioners from potential harm.

Table of Content
1. petitioners sought protection from threats. (Para 1 , 2)
2. government asserts no threat exists. (Para 3)

JUDGMENT

The petitioners have approached this Court seeking the following reliefs:

“To issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding Respondent Nos.1 and 2 to give necessary and adequate police protection to the lives and properties of petitioners and their family members, who are residing at Edapally, from respondent No.3 and her henchmen as requested in Exhibits P5 and P6.”

2. While admitting the writ petition on 4.4.2023, the following order was passed by this Court:

“There will be an interim order directing the 1st respondent to give adequate protection to the life of the petitioner and his family and to the residential house of the petitioner at Edapally for a period of two months.”

3. The learned Government Pleader, on the basis of the instructions received, submits that the petitioners and the 3rd respondent are residing far apart and, therefore, there is no threat as alleged in the writ petition.

In any event, insofar as the petitioners only seek protection to the life of the petitioners and his family, I dispose of the writ petition by making the interim order dated 4.4.2023 absolute. Sd/-

sab HARISANKAR V. MENON JUDGE APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 11921 OF 2023 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT FILED BY THE CRIME BRANCH WITH RESPECT TO FIR NO. 1024/2018 OF KUNNAMKULAM POLICE STATION Exhibit P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top