SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13535

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
SHIVAPRASAD – Appellant
Versus
PAZHAYAKUNNINMEL SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.P.RAVEENDRAN PILLAI
For the Respondents: SRI.D.SAJEEV, SRI.AJAYA KUMAR P.J.

JUDGMENT

The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:-

“i) Issue a writ of mandamus quashing Ext. P1 to P12 sale notices issued by the 3rd respondent.

ii) In alternate grant breathing time to the petitioner to contest the cases before the arbitration tribunal by filing appropriate petitions.

iii) Issue such other and further relief as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper so as to safeguard the best interest of the petitioner.”

2. The learned counsel for the respondent bank submits that they have no objection to granting two months to the petitioner to clear off the entire liability. This is recorded. 3. It is made clear that if the liability is not settled within the above-stated period, the respondents will be free to proceed further in accordance with law from the stage at which the sale proceedings were kept on hold.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top