SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13537

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
FAKRUDEEN SABU ARIFA BEEVI LATHEEF – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.M.SHAJU PURUSHOTHAMAN, SRI.K.S.RAJESH
For the Respondents: O.M.SHALINA

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner challenges Ext.P4 order passed by the third respondent impounding his passport, allegedly without notice to him.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, consequent to a warrant issued by the Magistrate, the Passport was impounded without notice to him. The petitioner has pending the writ petition, preferred an appeal before the Chief Passport Officer, Ministry of External Affairs, Tilak Marg, New Delhi.

3. The learned DSGI appearing for the respondents submits that the appeal has been received and orders shall be passed on the appeal, within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. This is recorded.

4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the Appellate authority to pass orders on the appeal, with notice to the petitioner and in accordance with law, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The Appellate authority may permit the petitioner to appear online for the hearing, as he is stated to be abroad. All the contentions of the petitioner are left open.

SD/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top