SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13541

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. KRISHNA KUMAR, J
BHASKARAN NAIR S/O.MALIYEKKAL PAPPIYAMMA – Appellant
Versus
DEEPA W/O.KOLLARA PREMLAL – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 759 OF 2018



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.G.BALASUBRAMANIAN, SMT.AMBILY PREMKUMAR
For the Respondents: SHRI.K.P.SURESH KUMAR

A petition can be dismissed as infructuous when the matter is no longer relevant or necessary for adjudication.

Headnote:The petitioners sought relief under OP

(C) No. 759 of 2018 against the order dated 01.01.2018 by the Additional Sub Court, Irinjalakuda. The court found the original petition no longer necessary, leading to dismissal as infructuous. Ultimately, the court ruled: "the original petition is dismissed as infructuous."

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, the original petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

P.KRISHNA KUMAR, JUDGE dlk/25/2/

APPENDIX OF OP(C) NO. 759 OF 2018 PETITIONERS EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE DECREE DATED 31.8.2017 ALONG WITH COMMISSION REPORT AND SKETCH IN OS 1055/2013 IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KODUNGALLUR.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top