IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
THAMPI.A.V – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“i. Issue a writ of mandamus or such other writ, direction or order compelling the 2nd respondent to consider and pass order on merits in Exhibit P5 application affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within a time frame to be fixed by this Hon’ble Court granting permission to develop the land.
ii. Issue a writ of mandamus or such other writ, direction or order declaring that the property of the Petitioner covered by Exhibit P-1 is dry land.
iii. Issue such other writ or direction this Hon’ble court may deem fit to pass in the circumstance of the case.
iv. Dispense with filing of the translation of vernacular documents.” [SIC]
2. The main prayer in this Writ Petition is to consider Ext.P5 Form-6 application filed by the petitioner under Section 27A read with Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008 ('Act and Rules' in short).
3. Heard, the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P5 within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the followi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.