SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13548

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ
SRIJESH.N.S – Appellant
Versus
SHEEJA M P – Respondent
WA NO. 506 OF 2026(FILING NO) | WP(C) NO.13956 OF 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.REKHA VASUDEVAN, SMT.SOYA D.C, SHRI.MAHESH C.R., SMT.ASWATHY ANILKUMAR, SHRI.SREELEKSHMI A.S., SMT.DEVIKA S CHANDRAN, SMT.ANN MARY ANSEL
For the Respondents: SRI.SUNIL KUMAR KURIAKOSE, GP

Withdrawal of appeal allows appellant to pursue alternative remedies as per legal provisions.

Headnote:Statute analysis illustrates the procedural context of the appeal derived from Writ Petition involving multiple industrial authorities under regional jurisdiction. The appellant seeks withdrawal of the appeal with liberty to seek alternative legal remedies, framed under procedural norms. The court recognizes this request, ruling the appeal as withdrawn while allowing the intended legal recourse sought by the appellant.

Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, J.

The learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the writ appeal with liberty to avail appropriate remedy, in accordance with law.

This writ appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top