Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13553

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
ABDUL RAHMAN C – Appellant
Versus
THE PALAKKAD MUNICIPALITY – Respondent
WP(C) NO.8298 OF 2022 | WP(C) NO.28649 OF 2021

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.JOPHY POTHEN KANDANKARY, SRI.SAJAN VARGHEESE K., SRI.LIJU. M.P
For the Respondents: SRI.BINOY VASUDEVAN, SC

Writ petitions dismissed as infructuous due to absence of a live issue.

Headnote:The judgment addresses two writ petitions concerning administrative actions of local authorities under the Kerala Municipality Act, 1994. The court finds these petitions to be infructuous, thus dismissing them. The issue framed centers on the legitimacy of actions taken by the respondents under relevant law. The court reasons that given the petitions' status, no hearing is warranted, leading to dismissal.

JUDGMENT

The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petitions have become infructuous.

Accordingly, both writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13553

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMVIJU ABRAHAM, JABDUL RAHMAN C – AppellantVersusTHE PALAKKAD MUNICIPALITY – RespondentWP(C) NO.8298 OF 2022 | WP(C) NO.28649 OF 2021

Writ petitions dismissed as infructuous due to absence of a live issue.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
ABDUL RAHMAN C – Appellant
Versus
THE PALAKKAD MUNICIPALITY – Respondent
WP(C) NO.8298 OF 2022 | WP(C) NO.28649 OF 2021