Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13555

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
R.VINOD, RAMABHADRAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 18658 OF 2021

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.JOLLY JOHN, SMT.LIZA MEGHAN CYRIAC, SMT.IRENE BABU
For the Respondents: SRI.RIYAL DEVASSY, GOVERNMENT PLEADER

Infructuous writ petitions are subject to dismissal based on changing circumstances affecting the petitioners' standing.

Headnote:This judgment addresses WP

(C) No. 18658 of 2021 where the petitioners sought relief which became infructuous, resulting in the dismissal of the writ petition. The court noted the change in circumstances which led to the petition's infructuous status, emphasizing procedural obligations. The final ruling dismisses the petition, reflecting the court's conclusion on merits.

JUDGMENT

The learned Counsel for the petitioners submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous.

Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13555

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMVIJU ABRAHAM, JR.VINOD, RAMABHADRAN – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentWP(C) NO. 18658 OF 2021

Infructuous writ petitions are subject to dismissal based on changing circumstances affecting the petitioners' standing.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
R.VINOD, RAMABHADRAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 18658 OF 2021