Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13558

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
MOHAMMED ISMAIL – Appellant
Versus
KAYAMKULAM MUNICIPALITY – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 19484 OF 2020

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.GEORGE VARGHESE(PERUMPALLIKUTTIYIL), SRI.A.R.DILEEP, SRI.P.J.JOE PAUL, SRI.MANU SRINATH
For the Respondents: SRI.T.R.RAJAN, SRI.A.RAJASIMHAN

The right of a petitioner to withdraw a writ petition is upheld if no countervailing grounds exist.

Headnote:The court analyzed the merits of the petition and the withdrawal request. The petition sought to address grievances concerning the municipal authority's actions. The court found no grounds to deny the withdrawal. The case was therefore dismissed as withdrawn, marking the end of proceedings.

JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.

Permission is granted. Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13558

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMVIJU ABRAHAM, JMOHAMMED ISMAIL – AppellantVersusKAYAMKULAM MUNICIPALITY – RespondentWP(C) NO. 19484 OF 2020

The right of a petitioner to withdraw a writ petition is upheld if no countervailing grounds exist.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
MOHAMMED ISMAIL – Appellant
Versus
KAYAMKULAM MUNICIPALITY – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 19484 OF 2020