SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13560

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
SINDHUKUMARI – Appellant
Versus
THE LAND REVENUE COMMISSIONER – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.LATHEESH SEBASTIAN
For the Respondents: SRI.RIYAL DEVASSY, GP

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P10 revision, after affording him an opportunity of being heard. The grievance raised by the petitioner is that pending Ext.10 revision, proceedings have been initiated for implementing the original order.

Taking into consideration the above facts and circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of, with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P10 revision petition, if the same is received and pending, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner and other affected parties, if any, within an outer limit of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

Sd/-

VIJU ABRAHAM JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top