SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13561

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MRS. SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, J
THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD THRISSUR – Appellant
Versus
SUNDARAN PUNNATHALA – Respondent
MACA NO. 689 OF 2015



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.GEORGE CHERIAN (SR.), SMT.ALEXY AUGUSTINE, SMT.LATHA SUSAN CHERIAN, SMT.K.S.SANTHI
For the Respondents: SRI.A.R.NIMOD, SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON

The court allows the insurance company to withdraw its appeal, leading to its dismissal as withdrawn.

Headnote:Statute Analysis: The appeal is made under the Motor Vehicles Act, relevant provisions governing motor accident claims. Facts of the Case: The insurance company appeals against the award from the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Tirur, representing its insured party.

Findings of Court:
The court recorded the counsel's request to withdraw the appeal.

Issues: The central question concerns the insurance company's standing in the appeal process.

Ratio Decidendi: The court acknowledged the standing counsel's request and permitted the withdrawal, indicating voluntary dismissal.

Result: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

JUDGMENT

When this matter came up for consideration today, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the insurance company seeks permission to withdraw this appeal.

The submission of the learned counsel is recorded.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top