SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13565

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
A M PAREED – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 872 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.KRISHNA KUMAR, SMT.RASMI NAIR T.
For the Respondents: SRI.M.C. ASHI, SR. PP

A pre-arrest bail application must show exceptional circumstances when not filed in the lower court, which did not occur in this case.

Headnote:This Judgment relates to an application for pre-arrest bail under the relevant provisions of the law. The applicant, having approached the High Court without exhausting the remedies available at the lower court, failed to demonstrate any exceptional circumstances warranting such an approach. The court found the dismissal appropriate as no exceptional circumstances were demonstrated. The issue of pre-arrest bail was succinctly framed in the court's observations regarding procedure and rights to legal recourse. The court ultimately concluded that the bail application was dismissed, allowing the applicant the option to pursue their remedy before the Sessions Court.

O R D E R

The applicant has approached this Court with an application for pre-arrest bail without approaching the Sessions Court. No exceptional circumstances have been canvassed.

Hence, this bail application is dismissed, without prejudice to the right of the applicant to approach the Sessions Court.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top