Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13566

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
RIYASUDHEEN K K – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 901 OF 2026

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.JASNEED JAMAL, SRI.P.SAMSUDIN, SMT.LIRA A.B., SMT.DEVIKA E.D., SHRI.ANAS RAHMAN C.P.
For the Respondents: SRI.M.C. ASHI

Bail applications can be withdrawn with liberty to seek remedy from a lower court.

Headnote:The bail application was filed by the petitioner, seeking an interim release. The learned counsel for the petitioner sought to withdraw the application to approach the Sessions Court. The court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the application. The final outcome confirms the dismissal as withdrawn.

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this bail application with liberty to approach the Sessions Court.

The permission sought for is granted. The bail application is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13566

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMDR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, JRIYASUDHEEN K K – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentBAIL APPL. NO. 901 OF 2026

Bail applications can be withdrawn with liberty to seek remedy from a lower court.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
RIYASUDHEEN K K – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 901 OF 2026