JUDGMENT

Anil K. Narendran, J.

This contempt case is filed alleging wilful disobedience of the direction contained in the order of this Court dated 14.10.2025 in R.P.No.1291 of 2025, whereby the review petition is disposed of by Annexure A3 order dated 14.10.2025.

Paragraphs 7 to 12 of that order read thus;

“7. In paragraph 40 of the judgment dated 23.07.2025 in W.A.No.221 of 2025, which is sought to be reviewed in this review petition, this Court held that, in view of the mandatory requirements of the reservation provided under Section 34 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act , 2016 (the 2016 Act), read with the provisions contained in Section 33 regarding identification of posts, the ratio of the decision of the Apex Court in Ravi Prakash Gupta [ (2010) 7 SCC 626 ] and that of the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in E. Dineshan [2016 (2) KHC 910], 4% vacancies for reservation provided under of the said Act for differently abled candidates with benchmark disabilities, in the post of Professional Assistant Gr.II (Library) in the Universities in Kerala, identified vide Ext.P10 Government order dated 14.02.2024, have to be considered as having arisen during the cur