Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
PRASANNAKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
HDFC BANK LTD. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Dated this the 24th day of February, 2026)
The learned Counsel for the respondent submits that, the physical possession of the secured asset has already been taken by the Bank. The relief sought was not to proceed any further steps, pursuant to Ext.P2 and P3 notices. Ext.P2 and P3 are the notices issued for taking physical possession. Since possession has already been taken, the prayers have become practically infructuous.
In view of the above submission, the O.P (DRT) is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
