SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13583

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
SUBASH P S – Appellant
Versus
BANK OF BARODA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.ANUPAMA SUBRAMANIAN
For the Respondents: SHRI.ROJO JOSEPH

BASANT BALAJI J ======================

W.P.(C) No. 6081 of 2026 ========================

Dated 23rd day of February, 2026 JUDGMENT The petitioner had availed a loan from the respondent Bank by mortgaging his residential property. Subsequently, the petitioner committed default in repayment of the loan amount as per the agreed terms. In view of the said default, the respondent Bank initiated recovery proceedings against the secured asset under the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act , 2002. Aggrieved by the measures so initiated by the respondent Bank under the said Act, the petitioner has approached this Court by filing the present writ petition.

2. During the hearing, the petitioner confined the relief to an opportunity to repay the overdue amount in instalments and to obtain regularisation of the loan accounts.

3. It was submitted on behalf of the respondent Bank that the petitioner committed default in repayment of the housing loan, and the total overdue amount as on 23.02.2026 is Rs.3,99,760/- (Rupees Three Lakh Ninety-Nine Thousand Seven Hundred and Sixty Only). It was further submitted that though proce

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top