SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13583

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
SUBASH P S – Appellant
Versus
BANK OF BARODA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 6081 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.ANUPAMA SUBRAMANIAN
For the Respondents: SHRI.ROJO JOSEPH

A borrower may be allowed to repay overdue amounts in installments if conditions are met, despite prior defaults.

Headnote:The petitioner availed a loan from the respondent bank by mortgaging property. After defaulting on repayments, recovery measures were initiated under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. The court allowed the petitioner to repay in instalments, subject to conditions. THE WRIT PETITION IS DISPOSED OF AS ABOVE.

Table of Content
1. petitioner took loan using property as mortgage. (Para 1)
2. total overdue amount and recovery actions explained. (Para 3)
3. conditions for repayment in installments established. (Para 4)

BASANT BALAJI J ======================

W.P.(C) No. 6081 of 2026 ========================

Dated 23rd day of February, 2026 JUDGMENT The petitioner had availed a loan from the respondent Bank by mortgaging his residential property. Subsequently, the petitioner committed default in repayment of the loan amount as per the agreed terms. In view of the said default, the respondent Bank initiated recovery proceedings against the secured asset under the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act , 2002. Aggrieved by the measures so initiated by the respondent Bank under the said Act, the petitioner has approached this Court by filing the present writ petition.

2. During the hearing, the petitioner confined the relief to an opportunity to repay the overdue amount in instalments and to obtain regularisation of the loan accounts.

3. It was submitted on behalf of the respondent Bank that the petitioner committed default in repayment of the housing loan, and the total overdue amount as on 23.02.2026 is Rs.3,99,760/- (Rupees Three Lakh Ninety-Nine Thousand Seven Hundred and Sixty Only). It was further submitted that though proceedings for recovery have been initiated, as a matter of indulgence, the respondent Bank is willing to accept repayment of the overdue amount in limited instalments and regularise the loan accounts. This is recorded.

4. Given the above, the petitioner can be granted an opportunity to repay the total overdue amount on the following conditions, and if they are met, to have the loan accounts regularised.

1. The balance overdue amount, Rs.3,99,760/- (Rupees Three Lakh Ninety-Nine Thousand Seven Hundred and Sixty Only) along with any accrued interest, costs and charges, shall be paid in 10 equal monthly instalments starting from 10th March 2026 and subsequent instalments shall be paid on or before 10th of every succeeding months.

2. Petitioner shall continue to pay the regular EMIs/instalments along with the instalments directed above.

3. In the event of default of any one instalment, the respondent Bank shall be entitled to proceed for recovery, in accordance with the law;

4. All coercive proceedings shall be kept in abeyance to enable the petitioner to repay the entire amount directed above.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top