SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13596

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
ANEESH K A – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: K.R.Prathish
For the Respondents: SR. PP. SRI. BREEZ.M.S

ORDER

Dated this the 23rd day of February, 2026 The accused in Crime No. 976 of 2024 on the file of the North Paravoor police station filed this Review Petition praying for reviewing the judgment dated 03.11.2025 in W.P.(Crl.) No. 221 of 2025. The above W.P. (Crl.) was filed by the review Petitioner under article 226 of the Constitution of India , for a direction to respondents 2 to 4 to preserve the CCTV visuals available near the place of occurrence, the mobile tower location and Call Detail Records (CDR) in respect of the Mobile Phones of the petitioner and the defacto complainant and also for conducting a proper investigation in the above crime.

2. On 03.11.2025, the learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the CCTV footage infront of the residence of the defacto complainant was not available and also that there is no CCTV Camera near the place of occurrence. It was also reported that, the mobile tower location of the petitioner was not at the place of occurrence. It was in the above context that the W.P.(Crl.) was closed as per the order dated 03.11.2025.

3. According to the review petitioner, no order was passed with regard to the CDR of the petitioner and the defacto complaina

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top