IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
INDIRA P.R – Appellant
Versus
THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT COCHIN ZONAL OFFICE – Respondent
ORDER
The petitioner has been served with Annexure I letter by the 1st respondent directing her to deposit Rs. 15,46,000/- in fixed deposit in her name and handover the original fixed deposit receipt to the 1st respondent by 27.01.2026.
2. The petitioner has stated in the Criminal Miscellaneous Case that the above action is illegal and unreasonable. The petitioner is not an accused in the crime and there is no reason mentioned in Annexure I letter for the petitioner to deposit the above amount.
Therefore, Annexure I letter may be quashed.
3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 1st respondent.
4. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 1st respondent submits that, in the investigation conducted by the 1st respondent in ECIR/KCZO/07/2025/263, it is prima facie revealed that the proceeds in Crime No. 119/2025, registered by the Muvattupuzha Police Station have reached the hands of the petitioner. During the questioning of the petitioner, she agreed to deposit the above said amount in fixed deposit and hand over the original fixed deposit. It was on the basis of the above undertaking that Annexure I letter was issued to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.