JUDGMENT Devan Ramachandran, J.

The appellant calls into question the directions in the judgment of the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P(C)No.23572/2025.

2. The Writ Petition was filed by the appellant on the assertion that Ext.P2 notice issued to him by the Village Officer, Anickad, Kottayam - notifying him that the property in question will be transferred in registry to the name of the person who purchased it - is illegal and unlawful; and further, that he had approached the Tahsildar, through Ext.P1, seeking certain orders, which require to be considered before the aforementioned notice is acted upon.

3. The learned Single Judge dismissed the Writ Petition, holding that it is an abuse of process; against which judgment, the appellant has come in Appeal.

4. We notice from the impugned judgment that the learned Single Judge has dealt with the facts in great detail; and we would not, therefore, want to add to the volume, by repetition.

5. Suffice to say, the appellant suffered an Arbitration Award at the instance of the 3^rd respondent – Bank; and he approached this Court for the first time against it, filing W.P(C)No. 21149/2018, which culminated in Ext.R3(a) judgment, interest