IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
PRADEEP – Appellant
Versus
OMBUDSMAN FOR LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT – Respondent
JUDGMENT
[WP(C) Nos.21308/2023, 26664/2023]
In these writ petitions, the respective petitioners seek to challenge the orders issued by the Ombudsman for the Local Self Government Institutions, contending that the orders issued as above are beyond the prescribed powers under the provisions of Section 271 (j) of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act .
2. Heard Sri S.K. Adhithyan, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Suman Chakravarthy, the learned Standing Counsel for the Thiruvananthapuram Corporation, as well as Sri P. Anoop, the learned counsel for the 3rd respondent in W.P.(C) No. 21308 of 2023.
3. In W.P.(C) No. 21308 of 2023, the petitioner is stated to be residing in a property extending to 8.5 Ares in Thiruvallom Village. The 3rd respondent sought to institute a suit for prohibitory injunction and, though originally an injunction was granted, the injunction granted in favour of the 3rd respondent was vacated at the instance of the petitioner herein pursuant to Ext.P1 order. However, the 3rd respondent thereafter instituted another complaint before the Ombudsman, and the Ombudsman issued the order at Ext.P4. Though in Ext.P4 the ultimate finding of the Ombudsman is to the effect
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.