Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL
For the Respondents: SHRI.P.V.ANOOP, SMT.DEEPA NARAYANAN

Writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous when the prayers invoked have no remaining relevance to current circumstances.

Headnote:The petitioner's counsel asserted the petitions have become infructuous. The Court noted this and adjudicated accordingly. In light of this finding, the writ petition was dismissed as infructuous. Therefore, the matter no longer necessitated court intervention.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayers in the writ petition have become infructuous. This is recorded.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.

JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :